A A A Volume : 45 Part : 2 Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics New Academy of Music in the suburbs of Athens: Architectural language and acoustical solutions Aikaterini Bousia Alexaki, School of Architecture, NTUA, Greece Tasis Papaioannou, School of Architecture, NTUA, Greece Giannis Karagiannis, School of Architecture, NTUA, Greece Alexandra Sotiropoulou, School of Architecture & School of Civil Engineering, NTUA, Greece 1 INTRODUCTION The present study introduces the New Academy of Music, an educational project set to be implemented in Kifissia, Athens. Envisioned as a hub for the community, the academy is designed with spaces that are functional, encompassing both indoor and outdoor areas. The proposed solution comprises two zones, namely, a public one where musical and cultural activities are hosted, and a more private zone dedicated to instruction/tutoring activities as well as administrative functions. The teaching zone consists of small and large classrooms for musical instruments, theoretical courses, percussion instruments, group classes, orchestra, choir, and studios for rehearsal and recordings. The cultural zone includes a chamber music auditorium of 350 seats, foyer, dressing rooms, an exhibition room, a small amateur radio station, and an outdoor multipurpose theatre for 550 persons. An open air cafeteria functions as a conceivable boundary between the two zones. Table 1: Project Identity Title New Academy of Music in the suburbs of Athens Architect Aikaterini Bousia Alexaki Supervised by Tasis Papaioannou (Design Advisor) Dimitrios Karydis (Urban Design Advisor) Alexandra Sotiropoulou, Giannis Karagiannis (Acoustics Advisors) Date 2015 2 SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT OF ROOMS 2.1 Building Program and Classrooms’ Arrangement After determining the building program, the arrangement of the classrooms has been defined by acoustical criteria. It was necessary to create a proper zoning to eliminate the disturbing noise from traffic, music practice and other noise. It was important to place together the rooms with low noise potential, such as theory classrooms, and maintain distance from disturbing traffic routes around the building1. Most classrooms dedicated to the teaching of classical instruments and theoretical courses have been placed at the most private and protected area, to reduce external noise. The classes for percussion and louder instruments, as well as the group classes for children, choirs and orchestra, have been placed in a specially designed underground level, to protect the rest of the building and surrounding residential areas from high noise levels. The auditorium has been placed, along with other uses more open to the public, at the most public zone, neighboring a park and enhancing accessibility via public transport. All classrooms and the auditorium are accessed by double doors to eliminate the disturbance from the circulation spaces to teaching and practice spaces. The building was designed to meet the ideal values for sound insulation, reverberation time and internal ambient noise. However, this paper focuses on the shape and reverberation time of theclassrooms and the auditorium that have been designed according to architectural and acoustical criteria. Table 2: Building Program - Teaching Zone Room Type Unit Size (m2) Total Size (m2) 14 Small teaching rooms for voice and instrumetns 25 350 4 Big teaching rooms for instruments, voice and chamber music 50 200 3 Teaching rooms for Theory (Groups) 50 150 1 Teaching room for percussion 50 50 3 Recording studios – electrical instruments 50 150 1 Room for children group activities 75 75 1 Orchestra rehearsal room 250 250 1 Choir rehearsal room 90 90 Table 3: Building Program - Cultural Zone Room Type Unit Size (m2) Total Size (m2) 1 Auditorium 450 450 1 Foyer - lobby 300 300 4 Group dressing rooms 55 220 2 Private dressing rooms 20 40 1 Multipurpose room 230 230 1 Radio Station room 25 25 1 Open air theater - - 2 Control rooms 25 50 Figure 1: Architectural Model of the Academy, scale 1:200, July 2015. Figure 2: Masterplan 3 ROOM ACOUSTICAL DESIGN 3.1 The acoustic design of the auditorium Table 4: Basic features of the auditorium Use Chamber music - speech Capacity 350 pax Length 28 m. Width 15,85 m. Height (min./max.) 3,5 m. / 8 m. Volume 2390 m3 Target RT (500, 1000 Hz) (occupied hall) 1.2 The auditorium acoustics have been pivotal to the design decisions since the very start of the project’s architectural synthesis. The auditorium was crafted with a dual-purpose design to cater to both chamber music and lectures. In light of this dual functionality, a target Reverberation Time (RT) of 1.20 s was selected for the project, balancing the acoustics for both musical performances and spoken presentations2. The shape that was selected for the auditorium was the classic shoe box that has been considered the most suitable for the combination of the architectural synthesis and the acoustical solution. Morphologically, the shape follows the grid of the whole synthesis, based on a rhythm that symbolically repeats itself in the whole project. Acoustically the rectangular shape is versatile, accommodating a range of music genres and also meeting the acoustical specifications for clear speech. The narrow width of the auditorium ensures that all the members of the audience will be relatively close to the side walls, receiving lateral sound reflections shortly after the direct sound3. This combination of the direct and reflected sound gives the music the desirable definition. The volume of the auditorium was defined with the use of the simplified Reverberation Time formula according to C.W. Kosten (1966) and the Sabine model. RT= (0.16V) / SAαeq where RT: target Reverberation Time [s] V: optimal room volume [m3] SA: equivalent audience area [m2] αeq: equivalent sound absorption coefficient (1.07 for full-room at mid frequencies.) The volume of the auditorium was defined by the target Reverberation Time and the maximum capacity of the room: V = RT.SA.αeq / 0.16 = 2390 m2 where RT = 1.2 s. SA = 255 m2 1 1The SA has been estimated for 50 choir members (50x0.5=25m2), 20 orchestra members (20x1,5=30 m2) and an audience of 200m2 The selected materials serve for diffusing and reflecting the sound while also contributing to an aesthetically pleasing architectural environment that aligns with the building's emphasis on clarity and simplicity. The entire design is based on the use of exposed concrete, wood, metal and glass. The auditorium roof is a waffle slab, a choice that allows sound diffusion. The walls are covered with wooden diffusion panels. Sound reflectors are hanging from the ceiling. They can be rotated to reflect sound for speech, or turn horizontally/vertically to contribute to the diffusion for music. The seating is elevated to allow direct sound projection and to ensure the visual contact of the audience with the stage. Figure 3: Auditorium plan view Figure 4: Auditorium Section. A. Music, B. Music, C. Speech Figure 5: Auditorium 3d Model. A. Music, B. Music, C. Speech 3.2 Design of the music classrooms The classrooms for musical instrument and voice teaching and practicing have been located at the south of the building complex. The smaller classrooms are at the ground level and the bigger classrooms at the first floor. The objective of the acoustical design of the music classrooms is to assure sound insulation and provide the right RT for clear speech communication and for music teaching and practice. The acoustics of the classrooms will be flexible as the target RT may vary depending on different instruments, the number of musicians and the purpose of practice. The flexible RT will allow the students to practice different music genres and discover how to control the clarity, the balance and the loudness of their performance. The shape of the classrooms follows the grid of the whole project. To prevent acoustical issues from parallel walls, smaller classrooms have a trapezoidal layout, and larger ones have an inclined roof4. The music rooms are designed to be used by solo instrumentalists or small music ensembles. They are expected to receive the greatest level of usage, as students may use them up to 40 hours per week5. Variable acoustics allow students to practice in different conditions according to the needs of teaching and their personal preferences. The target RT of the classrooms ranges from 0.4 to 0.9 seconds. Flexible acoustics in all classrooms are achieved through mobile diffusive and absorptive panels, allowing for a tailored acoustic experience. Sound absorbing materials are used to eliminate flutter echo and to avoid uncomfortably loud sound power especially in the smaller classrooms. Table 5: Basic features of the teaching classes modules A. Small Classrooms Use Teaching / practice of musical instruments Length 5.8 m Width (min./max.) 2.94/4.45 m Height 3.45 m Volume 74 m3 RT Variable B. Large Classrooms Use Teaching / practice of musical instruments Length 7.4 m Width 7.2 m Height (min./max.) 4.3/5.9 m Volume 272 m3 RT Variable Figure 6: Plan and section of small and large classroom modules. Figure 7: Classroom module 3d model 3.3 Conclusions The design of the New Music Academy was based on a set of architectural and acoustic parameters. The acoustics of the spaces and the ideal reverberation time were decisive for the compositional decisions that determined the shape of the rooms, their volume and the choice of materials. The architectural composition aims to create an educational environment that will allow the users to enjoy the process and have the best results in their practice and performance. 4 REFERENCES Building bulletin 93: Acoustic design of schools: performance standards, February 2015 DIN 18041:2004-05, Acoustic quality in small to medium-sized rooms Α. Σωηηροπούλοσ, Ακοσζηικός Στεδιαζμός Αιθοσζών Ακροαηηρίοσ [ΠροπηστιακόΕγτειρίδιο]. Κάλλιπος, Ανοικηές Ακαδημαϊκές Εκδόζεις. https://hdl.handle.net/11419/5850 Barron, H.M. Auditorium acoustics and architectural design, E &FN SPON, London (1993). C. Pop, R. Osman and J. Knight, ‘Music practice rooms: Ambitions, limitations and practical acoustic design’, Proceedings of ISMA 2019, 195-205. (September 2019) Acknowledgements This paper was produced in the frame of diploma thesis of ex student Aikaterini Bousia Alexaki in the School of Architecture, National Technical University of Athens. Previous Paper 19 of 37 Next